Wow Tech Support

  • Subscribe to our RSS feed.
  • Twitter
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • Facebook
  • Digg

Monday, 27 August 2012

Nerf low/null PvE ganking: remove local channel!

Posted on 22:00 by Unknown
While I'm not Jester yet, I have another post for today, a more to think about than this technical suggestion.

Also, since this post about aggression nerf, there is a related post on TheMittani.com that is roughly says the same as my most attacked post: low and null PvP is just for PR, the goal is to make a WoW-like themepark in highsec full of subscribers. What the poster missed is that it mostly complete. You already can't practically gank someone in highsec who is not stupid. The remaining nerfs are just there to protect the utterly stupid like an AFK miner.I know, it should be a comment there but there is no commenting section (I can understand that, moderating comments is a huge job and they have 10x more visitors than me, I don't want to imagine their troll amount).


"Watch local" is the No1 advice for anyone doing PvE in low/null. "PvP-ers" who specialized in killing ships that can't shoot back (like this mining barge) whine because local channel allows the targets to run away. They want to nerf local so they can be the unseen menace decimating miners, ratters and missioners. I think the brave warriors of New Eden who every day face the horror of fighting exhumers and Tengus already in armor due to rats deserve every support!

Let's start with experimental data, found by Sugar:
Strange: the kill:population ratio is about 3x bigger in null than in WH despite of similar mechanics. The main differences are the lack of local channel and having to make an effort to find the entrance. It seems it's safer to be in WH than null.

Let's continue with what I've seen in my null visits: if local is empty or only 1-2 guy in it, I can casually warp gate to gate. If there are more, it's a chance to be a PvP gang, so I MWD-align before warping and I first warp to a celestial. If there are 5-6, I jump to dscan range first or simply burn back to the gate. Local channel is very helpful to me. The problem is that I'm the "invader" here. It should help the locals, not me.

Without local channel the roaming ganker couldn't know who is in the system. Most of the systems are empty. Now the ganker can see that on local and jump to the next. Without that, he'd have to stop in every system and scan to determine who's at home and where. That's awful lot of scanning that slows the roam down painfully with two effects: at first he can cover much smaller area in the same time, therefore having much less chance to be in the same system as a target. Secondly, if he is spotted (for example by a cloaky at the gate), his low speed makes it very easy for the homeowners to organize a fleet to catch him.

OK, he is still alive and after hours spent scanning empty systems, he found someone at a belt. Currently local channel can confirm that there is one guy in the system, the miner. Without local he has to continue scanning to make sure that there is no one else in the system and even that wouldn't help against a cloaked gang waiting next to the miner. So without local channel he would have to do something that most "PvP-er" don't want: attack without being 100% sure that there is no one who can shoot back.

I'm sure that local channel - just like insurance - is a welfare feature to support bad PvP-ers. And the spoiled punks can't even appreciate it and blame it for their failures! Let them eat what they cook, grant them their wish, get rid of local channel! Don't just change it delayed, that would allow them to AFK-cloak 10 mins for intel, destroy the useless crap completely! Send watch list after it please!
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to XShare to FacebookShare to Pinterest
Posted in Random | No comments
Newer Post Older Post Home

0 comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)

Popular Posts

  • Diablo 3 Beta Phishing Season Begins
    The scammers are out in force with the recent Diablo 3 beta opt-in announcement.   Phishing scams are very common around any Blizzard beta ...
  • What would happen if people could trade?
    The question of mirror-ability of strategies often comes up when I post my trading strategy. The 0.01 strategy is clearly mirror-able. If th...
  • Tragedy of commons (and non-TC alliances)
    The tragedy of commons is a well-known economical problem, described by the anecdote: "herders sharing a common parcel of land, on whi...
  • A new approach to fight botting
    Botting is a widespread plague of MMOs. A botter can gain insane amount of game resources since it “farms for free”: the time of the bot cos...
  • The war for Finanar
    Finanar is a 0.5 system in Metropolis with 3 ice anomalies. If you check out my corp killboard you see lot of kills there, about 8B destro...
  • The (total lack of) balance of trade of highsec
    The fact that you can be much more rich in highsec than in the competitive areas of EVE (low, null, WH) is one of my main messages. It can b...
  • Planetary interaction for beginners
    Planetary interaction isn't a really profitable enterprise. However the "newbie-version" is a "printing money" schem...
  • Nullsec-altruism and a free titan
    Imagine that you are an avatar in Diablo 3. You enter New Tristram after defeating some risen dead. The town is clearly in danger. The undea...
  • The myth of the skilled, goodfight-seeking PvP-er
    While no sane man would claim that pilot skill decides large engagement instead of strategic decisions, there is a claim that there are skil...
  • (I'm not) defining lowsec
    This is a rather short post, will be one more today, about my very first PvP action. Sugar reminded me of a problem that I read about a l...

Categories

  • account
  • account theft
  • adobe
  • alpha
  • arena tournament
  • authenticator
  • authenticators
  • battle.net
  • beta
  • blizzard
  • brute force
  • cataclysm
  • diablo 3 phishing scam
  • dictionary attack
  • drive-by
  • email
  • fake
  • flash
  • game
  • Gold
  • guild
  • gumblar
  • hacked
  • hacking
  • hacks
  • Ideas
  • ISK
  • keylogger
  • march
  • mmo-champion
  • New
  • password
  • password stealing
  • patching
  • phishing
  • raiding
  • Random
  • ranks
  • remote auction house
  • scam
  • scams
  • security
  • security checklist
  • soccer
  • strong password
  • trojan
  • vulnerability
  • warcraft
  • wow
  • wowarmory
  • wowmatrix

Blog Archive

  • ►  2013 (242)
    • ►  November (15)
    • ►  October (25)
    • ►  September (24)
    • ►  August (21)
    • ►  July (24)
    • ►  June (22)
    • ►  May (22)
    • ►  April (22)
    • ►  March (20)
    • ►  February (21)
    • ►  January (26)
  • ▼  2012 (261)
    • ►  December (24)
    • ►  November (21)
    • ►  October (24)
    • ►  September (21)
    • ▼  August (26)
      • How could the RL economy crash?
      • Highsec protects gankers from carebears and not th...
      • New scam: contract margin trade scam! (and a 1B mo...
      • A wannabe nullsec alliance members plight
      • Nerf low/null PvE ganking: remove local channel!
      • Why TEST doesn't produce nanotransistors?
      • EVE server?
      • Moron of the week
      • A little gift to total strangers
      • The FW-LP "goldmine" is highly speculative
      • Titan vs 60 dreadnoughts
      • "War bonds toplist" for alliance PvE?
      • EVE Character report - August
      • The great shitworm scam
      • License, tax, rent
      • After Tech alliance budgets
      • Minimal wage and PLEX price
      • Bubble-camp survival guide
      • Screenshots from all over nullsec
      • The Great Battle.net Compromise
      • Guide to riches for low/null/WH veterans
      • Newbie guide to trading riches in EVE
      • Highsec piracy is practically irrelevant
      • Trade guru and hub-builder
      • "Good fight" and "EVE is real" are mutually exclusive
      • The shocking truth, mate
    • ►  July (25)
    • ►  June (20)
    • ►  May (25)
    • ►  April (23)
    • ►  March (23)
    • ►  February (23)
    • ►  January (6)
  • ►  2011 (4)
    • ►  September (1)
    • ►  April (1)
    • ►  March (1)
    • ►  January (1)
  • ►  2010 (17)
    • ►  November (1)
    • ►  September (2)
    • ►  August (1)
    • ►  July (1)
    • ►  June (2)
    • ►  May (2)
    • ►  April (1)
    • ►  March (2)
    • ►  February (2)
    • ►  January (3)
  • ►  2009 (4)
    • ►  December (1)
    • ►  October (1)
    • ►  September (1)
    • ►  July (1)
Powered by Blogger.

About Me

Unknown
View my complete profile