Wow Tech Support

  • Subscribe to our RSS feed.
  • Twitter
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • Facebook
  • Digg

Tuesday, 1 October 2013

1 player, 1 month, 1000+ kills, 123B damage

Posted on 18:00 by Unknown
I had a ganking campaign in February with the nice 52B worth of kills a month. Since I’ve realized that “big and powerful guys do whatever they want” is a lie and they are just padding their killboard and their ego with easy kills, I went on a quest to teach miners to tank their ships.

For most time, my corp only had one player in it, myself, the first and second non-me members joined days ago. I subtracted their kills from the corp result, leaving this one-man corp with 123.2B worth of kills in September. More than a thousand kills. I have a giant secure container with 749 corpses and the loot from the miners paid for all the ganks and some bonus.

123B is enough to buy PLEX to play for free for 19 years. It’s the price of a titan and a supercarrier. But it’s better to compare apples to apples. Let’s see how other corporations performed in the same month:
  • Goonwaffe (GSF): 354.3B
  • D00M. (NC.): 122.9B
  • Sniggerdly (PL): 445.0B
  • Dreddit (TEST): 113.7B
  • Red Federation (RvB): 176.2B
Save for Red, these are huge corporations within their alliances which means that they get on kills that they didn’t kill alone (a lone Goon pilot in a mixed CFC fleet get the kill booked for Goonwaffe). Yet, they only managed to get kills in the same magnitude as a single player. Some a bit more, some a bit less but the same amount of digits. Let me add that me outperforming Dreddit is a nice goodbye gift from Bob the God of EVE to that unmatched failure BoodaBooda.

But the best isn’t outperforming Dreddit. GSF (the alliance) had an official highsec ganking campaign, the Caldari Ice Interdiction. The result couldn't be masked as a victory even on the Goon Fox News, they had to admit "Unfortunately, without sustained pressure to back up the talk, their victims quickly lose their fear and the game returns to normal." Why? Because the corp Bat Country, the main corp behind Miniluv, the Goon ganking organization booked 142B kills this month and most of them are nullsec kills (read: abandoned Querious, Delve, PB structures, TESTies in Curse and fellow Goons during their stupid thunderdome event). The Miniluv page (which can be incomplete) books 30 Exhumers and 94 Barges for September. We Gank Because We Care had 281 and 311. This is really apples to apples: the mighty griefers of EVE, in their annual tear campaign were significantly outdone in their declared goal by a single player. A “highsec publord” I might add. If I were The Mittani, Miniluv would be dissolved and Warr Akini summarily podded back to Empire to mine Veldspar. By the way, the New Order Logistics, the ganking corp of James 315 booked only 55 and 149 ships, 58B.

How could this happen? About a year ago the mining barges were rebalanced because previously they were killable by a 3 days old throwaway alt in a T1 ship. That part was necessary. But CCP didn’t give tools to miners to defend themselves, like enough PG and CPU to fit proper tank, but they were given raw EHP. A 390DPS is needed to kill a naked Retriever in 0.5, it’s not something that a throwaway alt can provide. This killed “for fun” ganking. A bored nullsec player can no longer start a recruit-a-friend 51-days free account and massacre miners for lulz. Barge deaths went nosedive and miners got used to be safe without lifting a finger.

But 390DPS isn’t much for someone who cares to get it. My T2 fit Cata has 740 and I can dualbox gankers, being able to destroy anything below Procurers and 2-lowslots-tanked Mackinaws. Unlike the other ganking groups that tried to solve the problem by throwing numbers on it, I put my trust in the solo player. A solo player doesn’t have to wait for others or suffer the incompetence of others. A ganking fleet spends more time lolling on childish jokes than actually flying out to gank and fail half of ganks because someone didn’t have ammo, had safety on, undocked in a pod or shot the wrong target. The results of the solo player depend on his actions. He ganks, when he wants, where he wants, without having to discuss with others or depending on their resources. The very anti-thesis of the slogan “the best EVE ship is friendship”.

What I did is clearly not something that you couldn’t do. No “l33t skillz” are needed to gank miners. That’s the point. Then why does your corp with hundreds or even thousands of members have similar amount of kills as a single guy? Because you are held back by the incompetent fools around you. The funds of your organization goes to handouts to the morons and slackers and in doctrines you have to limit yourself to the lowest common denominator (the bombless bomber). If you want to achieve something above the average, you can’t do it in a group whose membership is - by definition - average. It doesn’t matter what you aim for, the best approach is starting on your own.

Of course you can join forces for bigger tasks now and then, that’s why I formed a corp and recruit. But your main focus should be solo acting. If the everyday tasks are too big for you alone, you don’t need friends, you need to improve. Fleeting up to kill Orcas or deadspace fitted 50K EHP Mackinaws is normal. Needing a fleet to kill an untanked Mack is being a failure.

My stats matching thousand-men groups are the ultimate proof of selfishness, individualism and the rejection of “helping friends”. EVE and the rest of the MMOs are purely meritocratic: every single avatar started on an equal footing. If someone needs help, he isn’t unlucky or cute but lazy or dumb who needs a link to a guide and a kick in the butt and not handouts of resources or carrying him in groups to get on kills.

Tomorrow I’ll talk about “why” and the future plans regarding ganking.


PS: I really hope this was RMT. I mean no one can be this stupid.

While I use to post anti-tears, this piece of tear is so perfect that I must share with you:
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to XShare to FacebookShare to Pinterest
Posted in | No comments
Newer Post Older Post Home

0 comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)

Popular Posts

  • Suffer mortals, as your pathetic password betrays you!
    One of the things we often don't put much thought into is password selection. Usually it is a loved-one's name or an easily remembe...
  • (I'm not) defining lowsec
    This is a rather short post, will be one more today, about my very first PvP action. Sugar reminded me of a problem that I read about a l...
  • The big EVE trick
    What is an easy game: where everyone can achieve what he wants easily. What is a hard game: where you can only advance by becoming better an...
  • You must station trade what you haul
    Well, actually you don't if you are fine with hauling for buy orders. This case you lose serious profit. If you are the station trader o...
  • The (total lack of) balance of trade of highsec
    The fact that you can be much more rich in highsec than in the competitive areas of EVE (low, null, WH) is one of my main messages. It can b...
  • Thinking about highsec POCOs
    In the next EVE patch, Rubicon, highsec customs offices will be capturable by players (actually you destroy and build your own, but it's...
  • What would happen if people could trade?
    The question of mirror-ability of strategies often comes up when I post my trading strategy. The 0.01 strategy is clearly mirror-able. If th...
  • October ganking report
    October was a great month for my corporation , We Gank Because We Care. You can see the results on the killboard but since October was 31 d...
  • The proper profit metric
    Live moron of the weekend post . Did they spent the last month under a rock? People having trouble making ISK with trading. Some rather go m...
  • ur a kid!
    The title is a troll comment I get often. It doesn't make much sense. It's clearly not an argument. While we know that socials don...

Categories

  • account
  • account theft
  • adobe
  • alpha
  • arena tournament
  • authenticator
  • authenticators
  • battle.net
  • beta
  • blizzard
  • brute force
  • cataclysm
  • diablo 3 phishing scam
  • dictionary attack
  • drive-by
  • email
  • fake
  • flash
  • game
  • Gold
  • guild
  • gumblar
  • hacked
  • hacking
  • hacks
  • Ideas
  • ISK
  • keylogger
  • march
  • mmo-champion
  • New
  • password
  • password stealing
  • patching
  • phishing
  • raiding
  • Random
  • ranks
  • remote auction house
  • scam
  • scams
  • security
  • security checklist
  • soccer
  • strong password
  • trojan
  • vulnerability
  • warcraft
  • wow
  • wowarmory
  • wowmatrix

Blog Archive

  • ▼  2013 (242)
    • ►  November (15)
    • ▼  October (25)
      • What the Freight Club killboard tells us
      • Those smoke filled rooms
      • Providence
      • Morons of the week
      • Evidence that SOMER Blink is involved in botting a...
      • Breaking news: The battle in Hadji
      • Punish the rats!
      • How to make EVE a bit safer but much more popular?
      • EVE Downtime: why 11:00?
      • Morons of the week
      • World of Warcraft: the working class dreamworld
      • Ganking in 0.7
      • Lilypad on the island
      • What impresses Ripard Teg?
      • New rule for WGBWC: we are fat, unemployed virgins...
      • “Skill” PvP is consensual!
      • Final Fantasy XIV ARR Account Hacked
      • The problem with Concord
      • The myth of the skilled, goodfight-seeking PvP-er
      • Do you want to make history or do you want to mess...
      • Dangerous lands for Mackinaws
      • If you don't tank in highsec, you are wrong!
      • The myth of "skill"
      • Why shall we gank?
      • 1 player, 1 month, 1000+ kills, 123B damage
    • ►  September (24)
    • ►  August (21)
    • ►  July (24)
    • ►  June (22)
    • ►  May (22)
    • ►  April (22)
    • ►  March (20)
    • ►  February (21)
    • ►  January (26)
  • ►  2012 (261)
    • ►  December (24)
    • ►  November (21)
    • ►  October (24)
    • ►  September (21)
    • ►  August (26)
    • ►  July (25)
    • ►  June (20)
    • ►  May (25)
    • ►  April (23)
    • ►  March (23)
    • ►  February (23)
    • ►  January (6)
  • ►  2011 (4)
    • ►  September (1)
    • ►  April (1)
    • ►  March (1)
    • ►  January (1)
  • ►  2010 (17)
    • ►  November (1)
    • ►  September (2)
    • ►  August (1)
    • ►  July (1)
    • ►  June (2)
    • ►  May (2)
    • ►  April (1)
    • ►  March (2)
    • ►  February (2)
    • ►  January (3)
  • ►  2009 (4)
    • ►  December (1)
    • ►  October (1)
    • ►  September (1)
    • ►  July (1)
Powered by Blogger.

About Me

Unknown
View my complete profile