Wow Tech Support

  • Subscribe to our RSS feed.
  • Twitter
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • Facebook
  • Digg

Monday, 10 June 2013

How can TEST win this?

Posted on 22:00 by Unknown
Since TEST quit the HBC, its situation became grim. It has practically one ally left, Tribal Band, which isn't really a powerhouse. Surprisingly N3 and PL backed it in the last battle but there is no official pact, it's more likely that they find the Goons larger trouble now and they can return shooting TEST any time. CFC is attacking Fountain, all out. Fountain is where both TEST members rat and where its renter alliance NOFKS lives. There are also moons there to harvest. Lose Fountain and TEST loses most of its income.

Now I think The Mittani made a fatal mistake declaring this war as "Nice region, we'll take it". It will cost a lot on line member enthusiasm. But it doesn't make it less true. EVE is about money, no matter how much the grunts believe it's about good fights and morale. Morale can't keep you in ships. The spirit of good fights won't help you against a supercapital fleet. CFC (and HBC) were built on Tech moons, their income allowed the leaders to keep the grunts in ships. The Mittani is right to only care about money. He is fatally wrong admitting it to his grunts, because if they start caring about the money, they soon recognize that their time spent in fleets bashing structures while running from bombers could earn them more money if they'd mine Veldspar in a Venture.

TEST is more relaxed about money. It has two squads directly related to ISK-making (the industrialist Antitrust and the ratter Admiral) and generally there is no shame in making ISK in TEST. But that is member income. The alliance income is based on renters and moons. It means that once Fountain is taken, TEST as an alliance will bankrupt, unable to keep the grunts in ships, therefore loses its power to fight on the large scale. While it doesn't mean the end and failcascade of TEST, as they can just move to FW or another, less worthy nullsec region, it will be the end of their importance on the Sov map.

This is a Blitzkrieg from the point of CFC: they have to make TEST bankrupt before their members get bored on grinding structures of people they don't hate at all, for ISK they won't see much of. Can it work? Yes it can.

What TEST needs to do is not only making the CFC plan "not work" but make it theoretically impossible. I mean if they could conjure up a financial method that guarantee their income even if they lose Fountain, they became undestroyable. Currently the war cry of BoodaBodda "we fight till the last ship and last timer and even come back after that" is just as empty as "God forgives, -A- doesn't". If TEST ship replacement program would not depend on Fountain, it would become unquestionable truth. From that point, the Fountain campaign would become a forever-war for CFC which cannot be won, even if they finally take it. The region would be useless as thousands of bloodthirsty trolls would be living next to it, sitting in an endless stream of ships. CFC would then have to ask for peace as the war could make them no good.

Actually there is more than that here. Since TEST is already swarming with pilots and have a culture where PvP losses aren't reason to be ashamed, they can only be defeated financially. Take that away and TEST become an unbeatable monster, something that can only be contained by extreme costs but can never be forced to leave. The CFC war is a breaking point for TEST: they either fix the financial Achilles heel and become the monster of EVE or they don't and they can go FW.

How to gain financial stability which is not based on moons or renters? Well, there is only one source left: members. TEST has 12000 characters in it, and from the fact that they field 1500 men fleets, we can assume 5000 active, playing people in the alliance. Back in the day, my 20B/month donation was 5% of the budget and they've grown, so let's assume 500B/month. That's mere 0.1B/member/month. If TEST could make an average member pay 100M a month to the alliance, they are safe. I mean from everything. No one can take away the members, so no one can take away the income.

Of course it doesn't mean that every member must pay 100M. If they could, there would be no need for ship replacement program at the first place. Many members are dirt-poor and doesn't bother. They PvP for fun if they have ships and play League of Legends if not. So an overall "pay 100M/month" order would be a disaster. Taxes wouldn't work either, as high tax demotivate work. They'll simply stop ratting.

The only way to get money from the members is asking for it, and making it a badge of honor. I wrote about a year ago of the War Bonds idea, to create a toplist for members based on the number of war bonds purchased. This way the large amount of ratters and industrialists could directly help their alliance while gaining personal glory, the same way as PvP-ers.

When I pushed it a year ago, it was in the wrong time. TEST was near its peak of power. They needed nothing, so they didn't care about it. Now the situation has changed. They are fighting for survival.

Finally: why TEST? Why am I so obsessed with the alliance that kicked me for posting on their forums? Because everyone else is so permeated with the "ima l33t pvpr" culture that they would rather go extinct than carebear. TEST is practically the only alliance with official industrialist and ratter squads. While others do PvE too, obviously as their ships must be paid, they do it secretly on alts while shouting "ima no fucks given badass pvpr" to the face of everyone. If there is an alliance that can make it, it's TEST. I really hope they make it.


PS: I know that Li3 is collecting money member-based. But it's from corporations and not players. The money comes from ratting taxes and moon money. It doesn't change the source of the money, just the collection level: alliance and not corp.
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to XShare to FacebookShare to Pinterest
Posted in Random | No comments
Newer Post Older Post Home

0 comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)

Popular Posts

  • Suffer mortals, as your pathetic password betrays you!
    One of the things we often don't put much thought into is password selection. Usually it is a loved-one's name or an easily remembe...
  • (I'm not) defining lowsec
    This is a rather short post, will be one more today, about my very first PvP action. Sugar reminded me of a problem that I read about a l...
  • The big EVE trick
    What is an easy game: where everyone can achieve what he wants easily. What is a hard game: where you can only advance by becoming better an...
  • You must station trade what you haul
    Well, actually you don't if you are fine with hauling for buy orders. This case you lose serious profit. If you are the station trader o...
  • The (total lack of) balance of trade of highsec
    The fact that you can be much more rich in highsec than in the competitive areas of EVE (low, null, WH) is one of my main messages. It can b...
  • Thinking about highsec POCOs
    In the next EVE patch, Rubicon, highsec customs offices will be capturable by players (actually you destroy and build your own, but it's...
  • What would happen if people could trade?
    The question of mirror-ability of strategies often comes up when I post my trading strategy. The 0.01 strategy is clearly mirror-able. If th...
  • October ganking report
    October was a great month for my corporation , We Gank Because We Care. You can see the results on the killboard but since October was 31 d...
  • The proper profit metric
    Live moron of the weekend post . Did they spent the last month under a rock? People having trouble making ISK with trading. Some rather go m...
  • ur a kid!
    The title is a troll comment I get often. It doesn't make much sense. It's clearly not an argument. While we know that socials don...

Categories

  • account
  • account theft
  • adobe
  • alpha
  • arena tournament
  • authenticator
  • authenticators
  • battle.net
  • beta
  • blizzard
  • brute force
  • cataclysm
  • diablo 3 phishing scam
  • dictionary attack
  • drive-by
  • email
  • fake
  • flash
  • game
  • Gold
  • guild
  • gumblar
  • hacked
  • hacking
  • hacks
  • Ideas
  • ISK
  • keylogger
  • march
  • mmo-champion
  • New
  • password
  • password stealing
  • patching
  • phishing
  • raiding
  • Random
  • ranks
  • remote auction house
  • scam
  • scams
  • security
  • security checklist
  • soccer
  • strong password
  • trojan
  • vulnerability
  • warcraft
  • wow
  • wowarmory
  • wowmatrix

Blog Archive

  • ▼  2013 (242)
    • ►  November (15)
    • ►  October (25)
    • ►  September (24)
    • ►  August (21)
    • ►  July (24)
    • ▼  June (22)
      • The one rule to keep to be absolutely safe in EVE
      • Dirty way to cleanse EVE from dirt
      • 0.5T
      • Wrong ragequit over a right reason + the importanc...
      • Why there are no NPC teammates?
      • Why the bind-on-pickup and mudflation?
      • The horrible industrial rebalance
      • Business Thursday: lazy man's PI
      • What makes an MMO different from WoW?
      • The dumbest game company ever
      • Why there are oppressive governments everywhere?
      • The uniqueness of EVE skill system
      • Business thursday: Traffic jam at Jita
      • The money is in the Goon schemes!
      • How can TEST win this?
      • League of Legends: easy as newbie
      • The first and last mistake of The Mittani
      • Pixel war on sexism, racism and other bad -isms?
      • There is no such thing as "free beer"
      • Damsel in distress
      • The true purpose of highsec
      • Why?
    • ►  May (22)
    • ►  April (22)
    • ►  March (20)
    • ►  February (21)
    • ►  January (26)
  • ►  2012 (261)
    • ►  December (24)
    • ►  November (21)
    • ►  October (24)
    • ►  September (21)
    • ►  August (26)
    • ►  July (25)
    • ►  June (20)
    • ►  May (25)
    • ►  April (23)
    • ►  March (23)
    • ►  February (23)
    • ►  January (6)
  • ►  2011 (4)
    • ►  September (1)
    • ►  April (1)
    • ►  March (1)
    • ►  January (1)
  • ►  2010 (17)
    • ►  November (1)
    • ►  September (2)
    • ►  August (1)
    • ►  July (1)
    • ►  June (2)
    • ►  May (2)
    • ►  April (1)
    • ►  March (2)
    • ►  February (2)
    • ►  January (3)
  • ►  2009 (4)
    • ►  December (1)
    • ►  October (1)
    • ►  September (1)
    • ►  July (1)
Powered by Blogger.

About Me

Unknown
View my complete profile