Wow Tech Support

  • Subscribe to our RSS feed.
  • Twitter
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • Facebook
  • Digg

Thursday, 17 January 2013

The future of the New Order

Posted on 22:00 by Unknown
Naysayers claim that the New Order will fail to have impact on the game economy and will remain a funny, roleplaying nonsense in highsec without any other effect than making some AFK-ers mad.

There are two challenges the New Order must - and clearly cannot - complete to reach its goals. At first, whole highsec must be covered. 2000+ systems. If we assume a Knight squad in every constellation, we will need more people online and in fleets than HBC had on the last timer of 49U. Clearly impossible.

Well, we are growing very fast, new Knights are arriving left and right so let's imagine we can continue to grow to the point of 2000 men standing army. Then what? The permanent botters and notorious AFK-leeches were smashed long ago, all that's left to gank is a few newbie Retreivers who failed to read the forums or talk with anyone in the belt who could have informed them. Maybe sometimes a permit holder thinks that 10M bought him AFK-ing rights and doesn't respond in local for longer time. But at this stage there will be 1-2 violating miners every day per constellation. A huge standing fleet is impossible on its own, now we are talking about a huge, standing patrolling but not fighting fleet. Let's be honest after a week of patrol most people will move to do something more fun, like grinding structures in stealth bombers.

We have to face it, the goals of the New Order are completely out of reach.

However the New Order is for the miners, and wish to facilitate the arrival of the active miner. It's not a mythical creature. New players mine actively since they are interested in the game. Casual miners detto. Multiboxers without bot also need to be around to manage their fleet. There are already active miners and with even a slight increase of mineral prices their numbers will grow.

Contrary to naysayers, the active miner isn't just looking at the cycle. He is watching local, communicating with other miners, watching directional scan for random griefers and so on. And above all, he spends his time in the belt (for obvious reasons). He knows that his worst enemy is the AFK-leech who devalues his products. So when he warps in the belt he checks on the fellow miners, both to join/form Orca-boosted fleet and to find AFK-ers. If he finds one and communication attempts fail for a longer period, he alerts the rest of the miners in the constellation, they relog to ganker alts and dispose the imposter. He won't get too many kills, but he won't mind as he is a miner. The kills are rather a little spice to his mining day. It will also serve as an introduction to PvP for the mainly PvE-er miners. His main activity will be - surprise - mining and socializing. Yes, I promote socializing as it is one level above leeching.

What about the Knights? Well, there will always be need for Knights but not in the number of thousands or even hundreds. A dozen Knights at a time online can keep the whole highsec clear. How? Because they don't have to bother about lone AFK-ing Macks, the miners handle those. The Knights are only called when the bad guys are really bad: bot-fleets, tanked Skiff AFK-er, combat ship protected bait Macks and so on. By the time we get to this phase, the Knighs will improve a lot. Those Knights won't resemble to the rag-tag militia of today. Orca alts will be all around highsec of the various knights, so one Orca can move to position in a few jumps. The Knights podjump to a close station, move to the Orca which deploys a few T2 Catalysts that the Knights mount and dispose the infidel. If the baddie is really-really bad, like a 20+ member botfleet, one of them follow it in covops, a proper fleet is planned for the next evening and the field cleaned up completely.

So yes, the low-meta Cata riding few days old alts of casual gankers have no future. But the active miners combined with a small elite force has. You probably guessed it, the crucial question is "will there be enough PvE players who switch to mining from missioning/ratting"? Only time will tell.
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to XShare to FacebookShare to Pinterest
Posted in Random | No comments
Newer Post Older Post Home

0 comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)

Popular Posts

  • Suffer mortals, as your pathetic password betrays you!
    One of the things we often don't put much thought into is password selection. Usually it is a loved-one's name or an easily remembe...
  • (I'm not) defining lowsec
    This is a rather short post, will be one more today, about my very first PvP action. Sugar reminded me of a problem that I read about a l...
  • The big EVE trick
    What is an easy game: where everyone can achieve what he wants easily. What is a hard game: where you can only advance by becoming better an...
  • You must station trade what you haul
    Well, actually you don't if you are fine with hauling for buy orders. This case you lose serious profit. If you are the station trader o...
  • The (total lack of) balance of trade of highsec
    The fact that you can be much more rich in highsec than in the competitive areas of EVE (low, null, WH) is one of my main messages. It can b...
  • Thinking about highsec POCOs
    In the next EVE patch, Rubicon, highsec customs offices will be capturable by players (actually you destroy and build your own, but it's...
  • What would happen if people could trade?
    The question of mirror-ability of strategies often comes up when I post my trading strategy. The 0.01 strategy is clearly mirror-able. If th...
  • October ganking report
    October was a great month for my corporation , We Gank Because We Care. You can see the results on the killboard but since October was 31 d...
  • The proper profit metric
    Live moron of the weekend post . Did they spent the last month under a rock? People having trouble making ISK with trading. Some rather go m...
  • ur a kid!
    The title is a troll comment I get often. It doesn't make much sense. It's clearly not an argument. While we know that socials don...

Categories

  • account
  • account theft
  • adobe
  • alpha
  • arena tournament
  • authenticator
  • authenticators
  • battle.net
  • beta
  • blizzard
  • brute force
  • cataclysm
  • diablo 3 phishing scam
  • dictionary attack
  • drive-by
  • email
  • fake
  • flash
  • game
  • Gold
  • guild
  • gumblar
  • hacked
  • hacking
  • hacks
  • Ideas
  • ISK
  • keylogger
  • march
  • mmo-champion
  • New
  • password
  • password stealing
  • patching
  • phishing
  • raiding
  • Random
  • ranks
  • remote auction house
  • scam
  • scams
  • security
  • security checklist
  • soccer
  • strong password
  • trojan
  • vulnerability
  • warcraft
  • wow
  • wowarmory
  • wowmatrix

Blog Archive

  • ▼  2013 (242)
    • ►  November (15)
    • ►  October (25)
    • ►  September (24)
    • ►  August (21)
    • ►  July (24)
    • ►  June (22)
    • ►  May (22)
    • ►  April (22)
    • ►  March (20)
    • ►  February (21)
    • ▼  January (26)
      • Warehouse system for the New Order
      • Business Thursday: station trading metas
      • Highsec EVE: the most anti-social game ever
      • Best place for solo kills
      • Game harshness, death penalty, miners
      • Catalysts, fittings, seedings
      • Business Thursday: how to control the market
      • Passive income, active income
      • Bad, bad Mr Metis
      • The fundamental highsec corp problem
      • The future of the New Order
      • Business Thursday: Shuttle+ and Hek standings
      • What the hell am I doing in the New Order?
      • The Scripture of the New Order
      • 11 CSM votes for sale
      • The Lottery failure
      • Dead morons of the week
      • Why fight against the AFK-ers?
      • Business Thursday: seeding headquarters
      • Come fight M&S in the ice fields!
      • The economy of the suicide ganks
      • New Eden ice bot lottery!
      • Dead morons of the week
      • Why was I ganked while mining?
      • Business Thursday: Income from piracy!
      • Surprising statistics: where are the PvP-ers?
  • ►  2012 (261)
    • ►  December (24)
    • ►  November (21)
    • ►  October (24)
    • ►  September (21)
    • ►  August (26)
    • ►  July (25)
    • ►  June (20)
    • ►  May (25)
    • ►  April (23)
    • ►  March (23)
    • ►  February (23)
    • ►  January (6)
  • ►  2011 (4)
    • ►  September (1)
    • ►  April (1)
    • ►  March (1)
    • ►  January (1)
  • ►  2010 (17)
    • ►  November (1)
    • ►  September (2)
    • ►  August (1)
    • ►  July (1)
    • ►  June (2)
    • ►  May (2)
    • ►  April (1)
    • ►  March (2)
    • ►  February (2)
    • ►  January (3)
  • ►  2009 (4)
    • ►  December (1)
    • ►  October (1)
    • ►  September (1)
    • ►  July (1)
Powered by Blogger.

About Me

Unknown
View my complete profile