Wow Tech Support

  • Subscribe to our RSS feed.
  • Twitter
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • Facebook
  • Digg

Sunday, 20 January 2013

The fundamental highsec corp problem

Posted on 22:00 by Unknown
I wrote that I think the greatest design problem is making highsec PvE players having to choose between the safety of the NPC or 1-man corp and the social interactions of a real player corp. Several CSM members seem to already agree, considering Empire wardecs nothing but tools for griefing. James considers limiting highsec wars is just WoW-ifying EVE (more). While I formulated an answer for it, I realized that I only addressed a symptom and not the problem.

My main character is in the starter NPC corp and will forever be there. Most of my pilots detto. I never even considered joining a player corp. Only a few alts participated in TEST. Now my botganker alt is the New Order Logistics corp, but that's rather an identification badge, as the New Order activity is organized on a channel and fleets ignore corps.

I barely played together with my own girlfriend since we quickly realized that it's not effective. Which is the fundamental problem: in EVE PvE you don't benefit from playing with other people. Even if you benefit from having another pilot around, it's easier to make him your own alt. Incursions are the only PvE content in EVE where you actually have to be with players. PvP is different as a fleet of individually acting players is more effective than multiboxing clone-ships. For this reason PvP usually involves multiple players playing together.

Since you don't need other players for PvE, it's pointless to participate in PvE corps. Since the PvE corps have no point, they only exist as a form of socialization. This is why a highsec PvE player hates wardecs more than suicide ganking. A suicide ganker attacked him because of his (lack of) tank. He can avoid it by fitting a tank. The wardeccer or awoxer attacked him because he has friends in the game. He can avoid it by not socializing with other players. Telling someone to fit tank is an in-game thing. Telling someone to sever connection with his "friends" is a personal thing, obviously making him more mad. For this reason highsec war declaration is a griefing tool, since its only counter is anti-social which griefs social people by definition.

CCP thinks about wardecs because they see that there is barely any combat in most, one side just docks up. The primitive solution is to remove this griefing tool. However the correct solution is to give players a reason to have something together worth fighting for. If being in a PvE player corp would have a point, good players would join these corps and would defend them. Just look at nullsec/WH! Those players need each other to defend their land from invaders. Alone none of them would have a chance to hold it.

Without such need, good highsec PvE players are currently alone in the NPC corp or in an altcorp leaving only newbies and morons in player corps. The solution for the highsec wardec problems is making cooperative PvE play profitable. So my 11 CSM votes goes to the guy who has any idea how to make cooperative PvE play profitable (read: more profitable than solo or alt-play).

I have an idea for that: sovereignty light. Accepting L4 missions or activating strip miner/ice harvester/gas harvester in a system needs a permit. System permits can be purchased by corporations, individual players can't buy permits. L4 or mining without permit makes one a suspect. So players would have to gather into corps to have permit. Of course then they could be wardecced for their land. This would be a middle ground between the current "farm top PvE in safety" and the "move L4 and medium level ore to lowsec". They could be attacked by war targets only and not by everyone like in lowsec. Of course L1-3 missions and mining ore with a non-strip miner is allowed without permit, so newbies are not penalized.


PS: I support Sugar's suggestion about highsec entrance gatecamps.
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to XShare to FacebookShare to Pinterest
Posted in Random | No comments
Newer Post Older Post Home

0 comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)

Popular Posts

  • Suffer mortals, as your pathetic password betrays you!
    One of the things we often don't put much thought into is password selection. Usually it is a loved-one's name or an easily remembe...
  • (I'm not) defining lowsec
    This is a rather short post, will be one more today, about my very first PvP action. Sugar reminded me of a problem that I read about a l...
  • The big EVE trick
    What is an easy game: where everyone can achieve what he wants easily. What is a hard game: where you can only advance by becoming better an...
  • You must station trade what you haul
    Well, actually you don't if you are fine with hauling for buy orders. This case you lose serious profit. If you are the station trader o...
  • The (total lack of) balance of trade of highsec
    The fact that you can be much more rich in highsec than in the competitive areas of EVE (low, null, WH) is one of my main messages. It can b...
  • Thinking about highsec POCOs
    In the next EVE patch, Rubicon, highsec customs offices will be capturable by players (actually you destroy and build your own, but it's...
  • What would happen if people could trade?
    The question of mirror-ability of strategies often comes up when I post my trading strategy. The 0.01 strategy is clearly mirror-able. If th...
  • October ganking report
    October was a great month for my corporation , We Gank Because We Care. You can see the results on the killboard but since October was 31 d...
  • The proper profit metric
    Live moron of the weekend post . Did they spent the last month under a rock? People having trouble making ISK with trading. Some rather go m...
  • ur a kid!
    The title is a troll comment I get often. It doesn't make much sense. It's clearly not an argument. While we know that socials don...

Categories

  • account
  • account theft
  • adobe
  • alpha
  • arena tournament
  • authenticator
  • authenticators
  • battle.net
  • beta
  • blizzard
  • brute force
  • cataclysm
  • diablo 3 phishing scam
  • dictionary attack
  • drive-by
  • email
  • fake
  • flash
  • game
  • Gold
  • guild
  • gumblar
  • hacked
  • hacking
  • hacks
  • Ideas
  • ISK
  • keylogger
  • march
  • mmo-champion
  • New
  • password
  • password stealing
  • patching
  • phishing
  • raiding
  • Random
  • ranks
  • remote auction house
  • scam
  • scams
  • security
  • security checklist
  • soccer
  • strong password
  • trojan
  • vulnerability
  • warcraft
  • wow
  • wowarmory
  • wowmatrix

Blog Archive

  • ▼  2013 (242)
    • ►  November (15)
    • ►  October (25)
    • ►  September (24)
    • ►  August (21)
    • ►  July (24)
    • ►  June (22)
    • ►  May (22)
    • ►  April (22)
    • ►  March (20)
    • ►  February (21)
    • ▼  January (26)
      • Warehouse system for the New Order
      • Business Thursday: station trading metas
      • Highsec EVE: the most anti-social game ever
      • Best place for solo kills
      • Game harshness, death penalty, miners
      • Catalysts, fittings, seedings
      • Business Thursday: how to control the market
      • Passive income, active income
      • Bad, bad Mr Metis
      • The fundamental highsec corp problem
      • The future of the New Order
      • Business Thursday: Shuttle+ and Hek standings
      • What the hell am I doing in the New Order?
      • The Scripture of the New Order
      • 11 CSM votes for sale
      • The Lottery failure
      • Dead morons of the week
      • Why fight against the AFK-ers?
      • Business Thursday: seeding headquarters
      • Come fight M&S in the ice fields!
      • The economy of the suicide ganks
      • New Eden ice bot lottery!
      • Dead morons of the week
      • Why was I ganked while mining?
      • Business Thursday: Income from piracy!
      • Surprising statistics: where are the PvP-ers?
  • ►  2012 (261)
    • ►  December (24)
    • ►  November (21)
    • ►  October (24)
    • ►  September (21)
    • ►  August (26)
    • ►  July (25)
    • ►  June (20)
    • ►  May (25)
    • ►  April (23)
    • ►  March (23)
    • ►  February (23)
    • ►  January (6)
  • ►  2011 (4)
    • ►  September (1)
    • ►  April (1)
    • ►  March (1)
    • ►  January (1)
  • ►  2010 (17)
    • ►  November (1)
    • ►  September (2)
    • ►  August (1)
    • ►  July (1)
    • ►  June (2)
    • ►  May (2)
    • ►  April (1)
    • ►  March (2)
    • ►  February (2)
    • ►  January (3)
  • ►  2009 (4)
    • ►  December (1)
    • ►  October (1)
    • ►  September (1)
    • ►  July (1)
Powered by Blogger.

About Me

Unknown
View my complete profile