Wow Tech Support

  • Subscribe to our RSS feed.
  • Twitter
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • Facebook
  • Digg

Sunday, 26 May 2013

I told you it's not normal distribution!

Posted on 22:00 by Unknown
Few things annoys me as much as claiming that the results of people show a Gaussian distribution: most people have average results and as you move to the extremes, you get less and less people. There is no doubt that the abilities of people follow a Gaussian distribution: our IQ, our strength follow it. In games the amount of time real life allows us to play also. The "results are Gaussian" claim is merely saying "your results depend on your resources". If you play better, you surely played more. If you have better job, you were lucky to have high IQ and a high-earner family to get you to college. Saying "results are Gaussian too" is saying "your results are out of your control".

To disprove it, I started to collect results. It wasn't easy to get unbiased, straightforward dataset. The idea came from my girlfriend: Megaera. This is a very simple raidboss in World of Warcraft for damage dealers: stand where everyone else, shoot what everyone else, minimal "dancing" and even that is ignored in LFR. The Patchwerk of Pandaria. So I resubscribed WoW (just for this project, don't dream EVE players!) and went to kill Megs. 25 times in the same lockout (the week before the patch):
My girlfriend donated another 6 dead Megs so I had 31 screenshots of damage meters. Since I found that in most raids one damage dealer was AFK/DC/offline, I ignored the 17th, so got 16 data from each kills, 496 data points all together. Since the "DPS" field of the damage meter is weird, often providing higher number for a player who did less damage, I simply divided damage done with fight length (and 1.05 if there was a wipe before).
This is probably not an accurate DPS as there is time spent running between heads, but I don't care about that, I wanted to compare performances. So for accuracy: the below data is exact for "damage done on Megaera on LFR" and approximated for DPS.

With that said, the average, rounded DPS of the dataset is 65K with the sigma of 20K. I divided the players into half-sigma (10K) wide groups, so the middle group with the name "65" means those who had between 60 and 70K DPS. The left column is to be read "between 0 and 30" instead of "between 20 and 30" while the rightmost is "100 and above". The results are these:
As you can see, the Gaussian doesn't fit the results well, while "DoubleGauss" do. For easier comparison, here are the error bars (difference between real and fits). As you can see the "DoubleGauss" has much smaller errors.
The mean square difference is 0.0183 for Gaussian and 0.0078 for this "DoubleGauss", with most of the error coming in the two rightmost bars. I think it is because of the set bonuses, if someone gets good gear, he gets disproportionally better stats via set bonuses, so there are less "almost very good" players than "very good" ones. Both fits fail similarly for these bars, if we ignore them, the mean square differences change to 0.0168 and 0.0035 respectively, making this "DoubleGauss" almost perfect fit, within the granularity range (you can't get smoother results than 1/496 if you have 496 exact datapoints).

What is this "DoubleGauss"?
It's the sum of two Gaussians, the blue has the mean of 69K with 20K sigma, the brown has 47K mean with 10K sigma. These are two different, overlapping Gaussians, products of two yes-or-no different groups. It's like trying to measure size of dogs and figuring out that some of our subjects are actually cats. While there are genuine small-sized dogs (blue is non-zero in the sub-40K DPS), most of the low size results came from the invading cats.

This is the point when - instead of being satisfied that I was right - I double-checked everything because I did not want to believe it: the brown "scrub-player" Gaussian has 21% weight only. I - along with most good players - expected to see a small "elite" next to the large group of "n00bs". Instead I found that the good and average players belong to the same dataset, and the scrubs are the small minority that doesn't belong.

This is probably while Blizzard is losing customers: everyone - including myself - believed that the majority of the players is bad and catering to them is a good idea to make the game popular. But no, they are a small, but vocal minority. When Blizzard dumbed everything down to their level, they served this minority against the majority. While there are bad players who belong to the majority, they are indeed newbies and very low playtime players, who are like us, therefore don't need freebies, just shorter timespan content and more materials to learn.

The above graphs don't tell who are the "scrubs" besides two facts: they are unlike the majority and they suck at WoW. Tomorrow we'll see who they are.
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to XShare to FacebookShare to Pinterest
Posted in Ideas | No comments
Newer Post Older Post Home

0 comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)

Popular Posts

  • Suffer mortals, as your pathetic password betrays you!
    One of the things we often don't put much thought into is password selection. Usually it is a loved-one's name or an easily remembe...
  • (I'm not) defining lowsec
    This is a rather short post, will be one more today, about my very first PvP action. Sugar reminded me of a problem that I read about a l...
  • The big EVE trick
    What is an easy game: where everyone can achieve what he wants easily. What is a hard game: where you can only advance by becoming better an...
  • You must station trade what you haul
    Well, actually you don't if you are fine with hauling for buy orders. This case you lose serious profit. If you are the station trader o...
  • The (total lack of) balance of trade of highsec
    The fact that you can be much more rich in highsec than in the competitive areas of EVE (low, null, WH) is one of my main messages. It can b...
  • Thinking about highsec POCOs
    In the next EVE patch, Rubicon, highsec customs offices will be capturable by players (actually you destroy and build your own, but it's...
  • What would happen if people could trade?
    The question of mirror-ability of strategies often comes up when I post my trading strategy. The 0.01 strategy is clearly mirror-able. If th...
  • October ganking report
    October was a great month for my corporation , We Gank Because We Care. You can see the results on the killboard but since October was 31 d...
  • The proper profit metric
    Live moron of the weekend post . Did they spent the last month under a rock? People having trouble making ISK with trading. Some rather go m...
  • ur a kid!
    The title is a troll comment I get often. It doesn't make much sense. It's clearly not an argument. While we know that socials don...

Categories

  • account
  • account theft
  • adobe
  • alpha
  • arena tournament
  • authenticator
  • authenticators
  • battle.net
  • beta
  • blizzard
  • brute force
  • cataclysm
  • diablo 3 phishing scam
  • dictionary attack
  • drive-by
  • email
  • fake
  • flash
  • game
  • Gold
  • guild
  • gumblar
  • hacked
  • hacking
  • hacks
  • Ideas
  • ISK
  • keylogger
  • march
  • mmo-champion
  • New
  • password
  • password stealing
  • patching
  • phishing
  • raiding
  • Random
  • ranks
  • remote auction house
  • scam
  • scams
  • security
  • security checklist
  • soccer
  • strong password
  • trojan
  • vulnerability
  • warcraft
  • wow
  • wowarmory
  • wowmatrix

Blog Archive

  • ▼  2013 (242)
    • ►  November (15)
    • ►  October (25)
    • ►  September (24)
    • ►  August (21)
    • ►  July (24)
    • ►  June (22)
    • ▼  May (22)
      • What could CCP do with the launcher failure?
      • A newbie and also hardcore friendly WoW raid mechanic
      • The "carebear", the "PvP-er" and the blue doughnut
      • Who are the second group of players?
      • I told you it's not normal distribution!
      • World of Tanks cheat: the exploit
      • World of Tanks cheat: it's the economy stupid!
      • World of Tanks cheat: the lemming train
      • World of Tanks cheat: lucky and unucky shots
      • World of Tanks cheat: introduction and trends
      • Crashing Neocoms
      • Cap boosters, T2 ammo and time
      • The perfect limited-gate highsec mission boat
      • Dual character training
      • Keep it simple stupid! (or the CSM election fail)
      • A good example for traders
      • The rise of the non-aligned voter (and fail of the...
      • Living in interesting times
      • Ownership vs leadership (aka the Sort Dragon fail)
      • Blues and morality
      • Farms and fields will never happen
      • Business Thursday: mission mining at large
    • ►  April (22)
    • ►  March (20)
    • ►  February (21)
    • ►  January (26)
  • ►  2012 (261)
    • ►  December (24)
    • ►  November (21)
    • ►  October (24)
    • ►  September (21)
    • ►  August (26)
    • ►  July (25)
    • ►  June (20)
    • ►  May (25)
    • ►  April (23)
    • ►  March (23)
    • ►  February (23)
    • ►  January (6)
  • ►  2011 (4)
    • ►  September (1)
    • ►  April (1)
    • ►  March (1)
    • ►  January (1)
  • ►  2010 (17)
    • ►  November (1)
    • ►  September (2)
    • ►  August (1)
    • ►  July (1)
    • ►  June (2)
    • ►  May (2)
    • ►  April (1)
    • ►  March (2)
    • ►  February (2)
    • ►  January (3)
  • ►  2009 (4)
    • ►  December (1)
    • ►  October (1)
    • ►  September (1)
    • ►  July (1)
Powered by Blogger.

About Me

Unknown
View my complete profile